![]()
7:00 PM
Old/New Business
Central Meeting Room North _____
Mr. Healey opened the public meeting at
RE:
Present for the Applicant: Jason Younquist, Outback Engineering; Frank DiLuna, Attorney, and Michael Corey, Applicant.
This is the continuation of a hearing which opened on June 11, and was continued on September 10, 2007 relative to an application for a Special Permit A3 (parking determination) and Site Plan Review relative to a proposal to expand the operations at the Carousel Riding Academy at 1150 Main Street through the addition of a new 9,680 square foot, 34' high riding arena, parking, paddocks, roadways and manure handling and composting facilities for up to 31 horses. The arena will be located on the eastern portion of the property on a wooded "island" surrounded by extensive wetlands drained by intermittent streams that flow into the public water supply. (The entire property is located in the Aquifer Protection District.) The westerly side of the site is currently developed with a dwelling, two horse barns, paddocks, and an existing garage.
Chairman Paul Healey read a letter into the record from abutter Justino Fernandes, expressing concern about the potential impact of site lighting on abutters, and a request that all manure be trucked off of the site.
Mr. Chessia reported that he had reviewed the plans, and the applicant has re-designed them to remove all work from the Flood Plain and Watershed Protection District. They have done this, in part, by reducing the number of parking spaces to 23 (16 existing and 7 proposed). The seven new parking spaces to be located east of the arena building will be reserved for employees and handicapped individuals only.
Gary Tondorf-Dick expressed continued concern with the proposed "density" of the development in terms of numbers of stalls and horses, and its ultimate impacts on the Town water supply. He requested that the number of stalls be reduced, or that all manure be trucked off site. Current plans for the site indicate that some of the manure and wet bedding will be trucked off site, and the rest will be composted on site in accordance with an approved manure management plan, but exactly how much is to be treated each way is unclear. The manure management plan indicates that 12 truckloads will be hauled from the site per year. In his letter to the Board, however, Dr. Fernandes provided a rough calculation based on the amount of manure produced by 30 1000-pound horses, predicting that this would require 25-75 dumpsters to be removed out of the site per year. Ms. Murphy and Ms. Corey noted that whole they were also very concerned about any impacts to the Town water supply, that they felt that the Board of Health and Conservation Commission were on top of these issues, and that it was important for the
Sarah Corey asked that the Board and its consultant address the two issues included in Dr. Fernandes' letter. In terms of lighting,
In terms of manure, Ms. Corey noted that if the manure were to be trucked off site, she wanted to make sure that the number of trucks that would be needed could be handled on area roadways. Mr. Chessia indicated that even if all of the manure were removed from the site, it would not have significant impacts on local traffic. She also expressed concern that trucks should come and go at a reasonable hour of the day, so as not to create disturbances to the residential abutters.
Mr. DeLuna pointed out that best manure management practices suggest that they compost as much manure as possible on site. He also pointed out that stored manure breaks down in size, which would further reduce the amount of manure to be removed from the site. Ms. Murphy suggested that they include a condition in the permit indicating that composting on site can occur to the extent it is approved by the Conservation Commission and Board of Health.
Ms. Murphy asked whether there would be a separate trail or roadway for the horses to access the arena after the wetland crossing. Jason Younquist responded that since they were limiting parking on that side of the site to employees and handicapped individuals only, that he did not feel that the path would be needed. Board members discussed this and concurred that the path would not be needed.
May Powers, in the audience, asked that a condition be included in the permit prohibiting shows and events be included in the permit. Board members concurred, but noted that they would need to deliberate on what constituted an "event", including camps, birthday parties, etc. This lead to a discussion of how numbers of students, customers, etc. would be limited on the site in general. Earlier in the hearing process Mr. Corey had provided a chart showing maximum numbers of students, etc. on the site at any one time, which were used a basis for the parking calculations.
Board members voted to close the hearing, and proceed with their deliberations on November 5 at
RE:
The Applicant is the owner of the land located at
Mr. Gaskell traced the permitting history of the church since its construction, including a recent expansion proposal approved in 2002 but never built. The new proposal, which involves the addition of a new sanctuary building, and the renovation of the existing church structure for offices, classrooms and meeting space, is being presented as a scaled back alternative to the 2002 proposal, which generated a significant amount of controversy from abutters, and was ultimately never approved by the Board of Health. Mr. Strekolovsky presented several development alternatives, showing the new sanctuary in a variety of different locations.
The concept that they selected is intended to best preserve the appearance of the church "complex" from
The new plan would include 306 parking spaces, and a revised pick-up/drop-off driveway providing access to the main sanctuary and the classroom area.
The proposed location of the new septic system is approximately 500 away from the Aquifer and Watershed Protection District. The church also plans to place a conservation restriction on the portion of the site closest to Well # 4 and the Town water supply.
Board members asked how tall the new sanctuary would be, and the applicant responded that it would be no taller than the existing church structure.
Ms. Murphy asked that they encourage traffic leaving the site to use
Old/New Business
By-Pass Road through "Selectmen's Parcel"
Jim O'Brien, Chairman of the Housing Trust came before the Board for an informal discussion of the possibility addressing some of the traffic problems on
Ms. Murphy and Ms. Sneath noted that in light of the recent public input from the residents of the West/North/Beal area, that it seemed important to revisit the possibility of a by-pass road through the Housing Trust parcel. Mr. O'Brien responded that whatever is decided, Affirmative (the firm selected to develop the parcel) would need to evaluate the possibility of creating such a road, and its impacts on the number and affordability of the units.
Jim O'Brien presented a sketch alternative which showed a low key, private connector road between the two developments as well as a slightly larger by-pass road that would enter through the Selectmen's parcel and lead out to
Jim Watson advocated the idea of a through road leading from
Susan Murphy pointed out that it is very important to consult with the residents of Hillside Terrace to find out if they could tolerate a by-pass road going behind them if it resulted in less traffic on
The group discussed whether the alternative prepared by Jim O' Brien would, in fact, take traffic off of the much overburdened
Water Levels at Accord Pond
The meeting adjourned at
Respectfully submitted,
Katharine Lacy
Town Planner